Legal Blog News
Today's Date: Law Firm & Legal Blog News Feed
Law firm merger activity picks up
Legal Blog News | 2010/07/05 09:52
pLaw firm merger activity picked up after a sluggish first quarter in part due to a renewed increase in transatlantic marriages between large domestic firms and those headquartered in England. /ppAmong the 10 mergers reported last quarter by legal consultancy Hildebrandt Baker Robbins -- one more than during that time frame last year -- was the union of Washington stalwart Hogan amp; Hartson and London-based Lovells to form Hogan Lovells, which the report characterized as the second-largest since Hildebrandt began tracking quarterly merger activity. /ppA second cross-border marriage of equals, between Chicago-based Sonnenschein Nath amp; Rosenthal and London's Denton Wilde Sapte, was announced last quarter but is not included in that figure because the merger will not be completed until later in the year. /ppIndustry analysts say that after a period of caution, U.S. firms are once again looking for markets in which to expand -- and the obvious one for some is London, where many firms specialize in the kind of corporate transaction work that has long been the bread and butter of New York. /p


Price Waicukauski Riley, LLC
Law Firm Press Release | 2010/07/05 09:51
Price Waicukauski amp; Riley, LLC offers more than 100 years of litigation experience in state and federal courts throughout Indiana and across the nation.nbsp; While our office is in Indianapolis, Indiana, our firm focuses on representing plaintiffs in complex cases throughout Indiana and nationwide. nbsp; Our practice areas include:ullia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/class-actionsfont color=#7b1113Class Actions/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/business-litigationfont color=#7b1113Business Litigation/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/pharmaceutical-drug-litigationfont color=#7b1113Pharmaceutical Drug Litigation/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/personal-injuryfont color=#7b1113Personal Injury/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/products-liabilityfont color=#7b1113Product Liability/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/medical-malpracticefont color=#7b1113Medical Malpractice/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/legal-malpracticefont color=#7b1113Legal Malpractice/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/property-rights-litigationfont color=#7b1113Property Rights Litigation/font/a/lilia href=http://www.price-law.com/practice-areas/actions-against-banksfont color=#7b1113Actions Against Banks/font/a/li/ulHourly, contingent and combination fee arrangements are available to suit individual client needs.nbsp; Unlike many law firms, we offer real alternatives to the traditional billable hour for clients invlovled in business disputes.


Ore. trial court to reconsider $100M tobacco case
Legal Blog News | 2010/06/28 08:59
pThe Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that Philip Morris does not have to pay $100 million in punitive damages to the family of a smoker who sued the tobacco giant over its low-tar cigarettes./ppThe case, however, is going to another jury to decide just how much the death of Michelle Schwarz from lung cancer in 1999 will cost Philip Morris — and legal experts say it could easily be another big award./ppA Multnomah County jury in Portland originally awarded the Schwarz family $150 million in March 2002 before the trial judge reduced it to $100 million./ppOn Thursday, the Oregon Supreme Court vacated the $100 million award and sent the case back to the trial court to reconsider the punitive damages after ruling the judge failed to properly instruct the jury./ppThe court said the judge should have told the jury it could not punish Philip Morris directly for harm caused to others besides Schwarz./ppBut the court also supported the trial judge, who had rejected jury instructions the tobacco company had requested./p


Bankruptcy judge approves Visteon disclosure plan
Law & Court News | 2010/06/28 08:59
pA Delaware bankruptcy court judge on Friday cleared the way for auto parts supplier Visteon Corp. to begin soliciting votes on its proposed reorganization plan, which would leave unsecured bond holders in control of the company./ppOverruling objections from certain shareholders and holders of unsecured trade claims, Judge Christopher Sontchi approved documents describing Visteon's proposed reorganization plan and the process for creditors to vote on it./ppCreditors will have until July 30 to vote on the plan, and Sontchi scheduled a plan confirmation trial to begin Sept. 28./ppThe shareholders could receive nothing under Visteon's plan, and the trade creditors would get no more than 50 cents on the dollar for their claims, which total about $48 million. Their attorneys argued that the disclosure statement outlining Visteon's plan did not contain enough information on the company's valuation, and that the plan itself was unconfirmable because of how it treats various creditor groups./ppAttorneys for Visteon argued that the objections to the disclosure statement were without merit, or that they should be addressed at what promises to be a contentious plan confirmation trial stretching over two weeks.
/p


Gibson’s Lawyer Slams Grigorieva’s Claims
Law Firm Press Release | 2010/06/28 04:59
pMel Gibson’s lawyer slammed Oksana Grigorieva’s claims that she had been treated cruelly by Mel and that he hadn’t been paying child support.nbsp; His lawyer actually termed her claims as “sensational allegations” because they were meant to simply tarnish his name in the media./ppRight now, the ex-couple is battling over visitation rights.nbsp; Oksana received a restraining order last week causing Gibson’s lawyers to ask for a modification so the star can visit his daughter and spend time with her./ppKolodny, Gibson’s lawyer, told TMZ, “Oksana’s deceitful conduct in trying to terminate Mel’s access to his daughter continues.”/ppLast week, Oksana filed a restraining order against Gibson, and began spreading the rumor that he was not paying any child support.nbsp; The actor already has a tarnished image in the media due to past mistakes he made such as the anti-Semitic remarks.nbsp; It will be interesting to see how this whole debacle resolves between this Hollywood couple.
/p


[PREV] [1] ..[444][445][446][447][448][449][450][451][452].. [535] [NEXT]
   Lawyer News Menu
All
Legal Blog News
Attorney Blog News
Law & Court News
Top Court Watch
Topics in Legal News
Law Firm Blog News
Law Firm Press Release
Legal Opinions
   Lawyer News Video


Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the internet world. Small Law Firm Web Design by Law Promo
   Legal Blog News
   Recent Lawyer Blog Updates
Court won’t revive a Minnesota ban on..
Judge bars Trump from denying federal ..
Ex-UK lawmaker charged with cheating i..
Meta says it will resume AI training w..
Supreme Court allows Trump to deport V..
Hungary welcomes Netanyahu and announc..
US immigration officials look to expan..
Appeals court rules Trump can fire boa..
Trump asks supreme court to halt rulin..
Turkish court orders key Erdogan rival..
© Legal Blog News - Law Firm News & Press Releases. All rights reserved. - Find the latest lawyer and law firm news and information. We provide information that surround the activities and careers in the legal industry. Review tips and up to date law firm and legal news. With up to date legal articles leading the way as a top resource for attorneys and legal practitioners.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Attorney New as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Nothing posted on this blog is intended as legal advice. Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. Nothing submitted as a comment is confidential. Nor does any comment on a blog post create an attorney-client relationship.