|
|
|
Nixon Peabody taps ex-Choate partner
Law Firm Press Release |
2008/03/07 11:31
|
| pBoston Law firm Nixon Peabody LLP has hired William Tripp as counsel in the firm's private client practice, the firm said on Friday. /ppTripp, who has been a trusts and estates lawyer for more than 35 years, joins Boston-based Nixon Peabody from crosstown law firm Choate Hall amp; Stewart LLP, where he was a partner. /ppBill brings years of experience to our firm regarding the management and financial oversight of hundreds of millions of dollars in trusts assets, said Jack Fitzgerald, leader of the firm's private clients practice, in a statement. /p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glancy Binkow Goldberg LLP Announcement
Law Firm Press Release |
2008/03/07 11:29
|
| Glancy Binkow amp; Goldberg LLP -- representing shareholders of SunOpta Inc. -- announces 21 days remaining to move to be a lead plaintiff in the shareholder lawsuit. All persons and institutions who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of SunOpta Inc. (SunOpta or the Company) (Nasdaq:STKL) between August 8, 2007 and January 25, 2008, inclusive (the Class Period), may move the Court not later than March 28, 2008, to serve as lead plaintiff; however, you must meet certain legal requirements. table align=right border=0tbodytr/tr/tbody/tablepIf you wish to receive a copy of the Complaint, or have any questions concerning your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, of Glancy Binkow amp; Goldberg LLP, 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, California 90067, by telephone at (310) 201-9150, Toll Free at (888) 773-9224, or e-mail to info@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at a href=http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/ctr?d=137815amp;u=http://www.glancylaw.com target=_topwww.glancylaw.com/a. /ppThe Complaint charges SunOpta and certain of the Company's executive officers with violations of federal securities laws. Among other things, Plaintiff claims that Defendants' material omissions and dissemination of materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company's business and financial performance caused SunOpta's stock price to become artificially inflated, inflicting damages on investors. SunOpta primarily operates as a producer and processor of natural and organic foods in the United States and Canada. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants failed to disclose, among other things, that the Company was experiencing problems with its internal controls and inventory. /ppOn January 24, 2008, following the close of trading, defendants shocked investors when they published a press release that revealed, for the first time, that the Company was performing well below expectations and that defendants expected to cause the Company to take a material restatement charge in the near term -- rendering its prior reported financial statements and reports unreliable, false and materially misleading. The Company said it expected to post a profit of 12 cents to 14 cents per share for the year, citing issues within its fruit and BioProcess groups that led to pretax write-downs and provisions of $12 million to $14 million. Among problems the Company cited were inventories within the Company's Fruit Group's berry operations requiring a write-down to net realizable value, whereby preliminary estimates indicated that an adjustment in the range of $9 to $11 million for this issue and related items is necessary. The Company disclosed a charge of approximately $3 million pre-tax, related to difficulties in collecting for services and equipment provided to a customer under the terms of an existing equipment supply contract within the SunOpta BioProcess Group. /ppAfter SunOpta drastically lowered its fiscal 2007 profit forecast and announced that financial restatements are likely, shares of SunOpta plunged to a low of $6.05 on January 25, 2008. /ppPlaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of Class members and is represented by Glancy Binkow amp; Goldberg LLP, a law firm with significant experience in prosecuting shareholder lawsuits, and substantial expertise in actions involving corporate fraud. /ppIf you are a member of the Class described above, you may move the Court, not later than March 28, 2008, to serve as lead plaintiff, however, you must meet certain legal requirements. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, of Glancy Binkow amp; Goldberg LLP, 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, California 90067, by telephone at (310) 201-9150 or Toll Free at (888) 773-9224 or by e-mail to info@glancylaw.com. /ppMore information on this and other class actions can be found on the Class Action Newsline at a href=http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/ctr?d=137815amp;u=http://www.primenewswire.com/ca target=_topwww.primenewswire.com/ca/a. /p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judge KOs Challenge to Internet Bet Law
Topics in Legal News |
2008/03/07 09:00
|
| A federal judge has dismissed a challenge to a ban on Internet gambling brought by an online gambling association, but gave the group legal standing to challenge the law in an appellate court.pU.S. District Judge Mary L. Cooper in Trenton determined that the Interactive Media Entertainment amp; Gaming Association had not shown sufficient cause to order her to block enforcement of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, passed by Congress in 2006./ppThat law was designed to stop online gambling by choking off the electronic processing of money for online wagers or payouts./ppThe industry group had argued that the law was unconstitutional on many fronts, including freedom of speech and invasion of privacy concerns. It wanted the court to declare that people should be allowed to gamble from the privacy of their own homes./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. treasure firm ordered to identify disputed wreck
Top Court Watch |
2008/03/07 08:55
|
| A U.S. judge ordered a Florida treasure-hunting company on Thursday to disclose the identity of a disputed shipwreck and dismissed some of its claims against Spain in a legal wrangle over a $500 million haul of silver and gold.span id=midArticle_byline/spanspan id=midArticle_0/spanpOdyssey Marine Exploration and Spain have been arguing over the treasure since the trove was found last year at an undisclosed location in the Atlantic Ocean./pspan id=midArticle_1/spanpU.S. District Judge Steven Merryday ruled on Thursday that Odyssey's lawsuit claiming rights to the treasure could go forward provided the company promptly identifies the wreck for Spain, or gives its best available hypothesis of the identity./pspan id=midArticle_2/spanpAt a court hearing on Wednesday, the company's lawyers said Odyssey did not know for certain the name or nationality of the wreck, from which the company recovered some 17 tonnes of silver coins and gold./pspan id=midArticle_3/spanpWe want to know the identity of this vessel, and what this ruling is saying is 'It's not an answer to say we haven't decided for sure,' said lawyer James Goold, who is representing Spain./pspan id=midArticle_4/spanpMerryday ruled that parts of Odyssey's lawsuit could go forward through the courts, including claims for possession and ownership of the wreck and the artifacts./pspan id=midArticle_5/spanpBut he sided with Spain on several other elements of the suit, dismissing Odyssey's claims for monetary damages from Spain and a request for an injunction to secure the integrity of the recovery operation against interference from a third party./pspan id=midArticle_6/spanpThe two sides have been at odds since Odyssey announced last May that it had found half a million silver coins and other artifacts. It said the wreck, which it code-named Black Swan, was discovered in the Atlantic Ocean outside any country's territorial waters./pspan id=midArticle_7/spanpThe dispute turned ugly when Spanish warships twice intercepted the company's treasure hunting ships after they left the British territory of Gibraltar and escorted them to Spanish ports./p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US court dismisses suit on Barr's Plan B pill
Law & Court News |
2008/03/07 02:57
|
A U.S. court dismissed on Tuesday a lawsuit against U.S. health regulators over their decision to allow the sale of Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc Plan B contraceptive without a prescription.
div
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Barr were sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and other groups that sought to overturn the FDA's decision.
/divdiv
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted FDA's and Barr's motion to dismiss the suit.
/divdiv
The court said it agreed with defendants that plaintiffs failed had to identify a single individual who has been harmed by Plan B's OTC (over-the-counter) availability, according to the ruling.
/divdiv
Plan B was approved in 1999 and the FDA broadened the approval in 2006 to allow sale to adults without a prescription. The pills must be kept behind pharmacy counters and only sold to girls younger than 18 years old with a doctor's order.
/divdiv
Separately, on Monday, another U.S. court found the patent for Bayer AG's Yasmin contraceptive drug to be invalid, paving the way for Barr to sell a generic version.
/divdiv
It's a big win for Barr, Natixis Bleichroeder analyst Corey Davis said of the Bayer ruling. This could be one of those nice generic products with a long tail on it, he said./div |
|
|
|
|
|
| Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the internet world. Small Law Firm Web Design by Law Promo |
|
|
Recent Lawyer Blog Updates |
|
Lawyer News RSS
